The Panopticon was designed by Jeremy Bentham as a new sort of prison which through it's architecture created a new form of observation and surveillance. A tower was the central object within the Panopticon where all the cells contained within the prison were built around, everything was open and visible which was drastically different to a dungeon where the main function of it was to deprive light and hide. "Full lighting and the eye of a supervisor capture better than darkness, which ultimately protected. Visibility is a trap." (Foucault, 1997) Being on display, with nowhere to hide allows a person to be fully observed, and this observation is constant due to the central tower which leaves the people thinking they are always being watched. There comes a point where over time this would lead to the person becoming reformed as why do something wrong if you are forever being seen, the main drive is to achieve something without being caught "...they know they are under surveillance but cannot control exactly when they are really being observed - would have to lose the possibility, and finally the desire, of doing wrong." (Kaschadt, 2002). The main objective for the Panopticon may have been a way to reform prisoners, however because of the constant observation this could also lead to assessing different people such as psychiatric patients. It could have been seen as a place of scientific experiments due to the reforming of individuals and correcting their behaviour. "...the Panopticon was also a laboratory it could be used as a machine to carry out experiments..." (Foucault, 1997).
The architecture of the Panopticon could be adapted to suit other types of function such as schools - no copying off other students and no noise, hospitals - where any contagious illnesses would be kept apart, work places - where there would be no distractions between the people. "The arrangement of his room...imposes on him an axial visibility...this invisibility is a guarantee of order." (Foucault, 1997). Theatres influenced Bentham's Panopticon greatly as there was a central platform where the actor would be viewed from. They undertook a similar design, the actor would be constantly visible yet they would also be able to see the actions of the audience, observation takes place from both parties in this instance.
Taking this into the modern day, though Panopticons may not be in use anymore, the idea of it still is around. Certain spaces are laid out in a particular way to achieve the best outcome, open office spaces where everything is on view makes the workers be more productive as there is always the feeling of being watched. When looking at CCTV cameras, these are always watched society, trying to deter crime but there are so many in the world not all of them can be constantly watched. Our actions are always seen but are they always watched "...one is totally seen, without ever seeing..." (Foucault, 1997) Comparing functionality to scientific experimentation, the Panopticon
seems to be more of a place of observation and reforming where
experimentation can take place. "Under the watchful gaze, criminals would gradually mend their ways..." (Kaschadt, 2002)
Foucault, M. 'Panopticism (extract)' in Leach, N. (ed.) (1997) Rethinking Architecture: A reader in cultural theory, London and New York, Routledge, pages 356 - 367
Kaschadt, K. 'Jeremy Bentham - The Penitentiary Panopticon or Inspection House' in Weibel, Levin and Frohne (eds.) (2002) Ctrl [space]: rhetorics of surveillance from Bentham to Big Brother, Cambridge Massachusetts, The MIT Press, pages 114 - 119
Showing posts with label Panopticism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Panopticism. Show all posts
Saturday, December 22, 2012
Saturday, November 3, 2012
Panopticism
Panopticism is the control of conduct, behaviour and performance. It derives from the word Panopticon. Jeremy Bentham designed the Panopitcon as a way to create a disciplinary power and society. They could be used as hospitals or schools amongst others, however the majority that were built were as prisons and asylums. The Panopticon was a circular building full of individual cells, open from the front with bars and lit from the back via windows, each cell looked towards the centre where there would normally be a tower that could hold guards or doctors depending on the institution. The inmates could never see each other only the constant presence of the guards. This created a mental effect and soon the inmates would behave in the way the supervisor would want them to behave without having to actually do anything. It was the constant reminder that you are always being watched. The inmates were permanently isolated which caused a psychological issues, almost as a form of torture. Foucault (1975) stated that power functions automatically.
The Panopticon wasn't just about a form of control and discipline but also about watching, observing, scrutinizing and classification. It was a means of surveillance, to confine but also study the insane. Panopticism is a new form of power, that you are always being watched in some way, shape or form. An open plan office is an example of this, you are constantly seen by others so it changes your behaviour. We live in a surveillance society where every single action we do is watched in some way. There are countless of CCTV cameras around so it becomes self regulation, we are controlling ourselves for the fear of being caught doing something we shouldn't. It is similar within the social media aspect, everything is observed by someone so it can make you behave in a certain way to how you normally are, which could in turn shape an identity. Foucault describes it as a mental process yet it is not physically conforming.
The Panopticon wasn't just about a form of control and discipline but also about watching, observing, scrutinizing and classification. It was a means of surveillance, to confine but also study the insane. Panopticism is a new form of power, that you are always being watched in some way, shape or form. An open plan office is an example of this, you are constantly seen by others so it changes your behaviour. We live in a surveillance society where every single action we do is watched in some way. There are countless of CCTV cameras around so it becomes self regulation, we are controlling ourselves for the fear of being caught doing something we shouldn't. It is similar within the social media aspect, everything is observed by someone so it can make you behave in a certain way to how you normally are, which could in turn shape an identity. Foucault describes it as a mental process yet it is not physically conforming.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)